PremiumBukkake.com Discussion Thread

[MKJSPH]

Bring back the Gloryholes

Hard PASS!

[Mr. Donkey]

Great discovery this week's girl, Marta Villalobos. My only complaint is that she was employed in a very short scene. I dare to predict that she will star in the next release. I don't like seeing the same girl twice in a row, and I would prefer that she be reserved for later, for a big event with the full team of bukkakeros.

These short scenes... Apart from being short, they are unbalanced, the blowjob phase is as long as the reception phase. Since for economic reasons it seems impossible to increase the number of loads, some tricks could be used to lengthen the swallowing phase. What if the guys come one at a time, instead of two at a time?

[gregory]

Bring back the Gloryholes

oh yes please but with girls they know what they are doing

[piranorton]

My only complaint is that she was employed in a very short scene. I dare to predict that she will star in the next release. I don't like seeing the same girl twice in a row, and I would prefer that she be reserved for later, for a big event with the full team of bukkakeros.

It's already done, when she looks around she comments abount seeing 50+ guys, which Giorgio acknowledges. They just take a break to change the outfit and clean up a bit.

However I think there is a great chance for Marta to return later for more, she sticks around a lot. (Unlike the Queen, Chloe and others people are craving for.) She would be a much better "emergency hire" than say Alexandra was.

[doctor01]

immediate return to the fluffer girl. Today's pb bukkakes look like they are for the circus. introduce standards. necessarily a big cup like before and no wine glasses. All semen around the mouth must be swallowed. don't have a bukkake party with less than 50+ cumshots. Introduce standards in clothing. only erotic bra, thongs and stockings and high heels are allowed. just like before. Girl's head all the way back. this is urgent.

[doctor01]

pb should stick to the bukkakes. the fake gloryhole box with the hole setup is not it.

Yes

[vextime]

More Saba, pb seems to have a problem retaining the good cum dumps for more than one session, surely they are not that toxic to work with......

[gregory]

immediate return to the fluffer girl. Today's pb bukkakes look like they are for the circus. introduce standards. necessarily a big cup like before and no wine glasses. All semen around the mouth must be swallowed. don't have a bukkake party with less than 50+ cumshots. Introduce standards in clothing. only erotic bra, thongs and stockings and high heels are allowed. just like before. Girl's head all the way back. this is urgent.

bring back the salad bowl and real gloryholes then

quite agree with erotic bra, thongs, high heels etc.

[WAO137]

Marta Villalobos #2 is out with 45 loads

Marta.jpg (62.69 KiB) Viewed 8608 times

Plus her gloryhole scene is out on Putalocura https://www.putalocura.com/glory-hole/una-traga-semen-insaciable-marta-villalobos

Marta GH PL.jpg (30.24 KiB) Viewed 8603 times

[xtripsnova]

Marta is trying hard. Hats off to her. But, at best, her scenes are funny.
She is hyperactive, overacting. It’s too much.
Not for me.

[thebowl]

I'd like to know their real logic behind shortening the scene to a 20 odd load scene followed by a slightly larger scene, rather than just film a full larger scene. Who really prefers this? Wouldn't everyone rather wait an extra few days without a small bukkake in odder to get a proper bukkake scene? These people are the most out of touch with their fanbase in the history of all things with fans.

[bigload]

^I agree, would def wait 10 days to get 1 large scene instead of 2 smaller ones every 5 days

[piranorton]

Marta is trying hard. Hats off to her. But, at best, her scenes are funny.
She is hyperactive, overacting. It’s too much.

My problem is not the hyperactivity, but the hyperactivity + chaotic nature of the filming together. I think there were more double cumshots in the second video than single. It's okay for models like Esa, who can remain steady as a rock and open their mouth super wide, but Marta is always tracking the nearest cock while trying to speak(!) with a half-filled mouth, which is not ideal and results in a lot of missed shoots.

Marta #2 is a bit of a letdown for many other reasons, she has red eyes from the start (I hate it), she's a bit exhausted, loads are generally pretty weak, many loads are wasted for facials, which is a luxury, when your overall load count is just 45.

Not sure who camera operator #2 is, but it's consistently getting better and it is now basically a zoomed out camera 1, often from a much better angle.

I'd like to know their real logic behind shortening the scene to a 20 odd load scene followed by a slightly larger scene, rather than just film a full larger scene.

1. Two outfits can be sold instead of one.
2. Let's say 50 men show up, then they film the first scene with half of them, wait an hour (the girl cleans up and changes outfit) then eveybody dumps their load (including the first 25 guys). Half of the loads will be second rate for sure, but still count as regular loads. Now you have two scenes, two updates. Without the first scene at best you would get one 50-load scene, with slightly better average loads, but not a 75-load scene. It is clearly a byproduct of cutting costs and having as few guys as possible.
3. I think in the poll people voted for more frequent, but smaller updates, but of course people don't do the math and vote for whichever seems to be the better offer at first sight.

[Gregorious]

I'd like to know their real logic behind shortening the scene to a 20 odd load scene followed by a slightly larger scene, rather than just film a full larger scene...

I think xtripsnova posted a reasonable answer (even if you might not agree) explaining why PB don't want to get off the 5 days cycle :
viewtopic.php?f=51&t=25907&start=19470#p488870

I think in the poll people voted for more frequent, but smaller updates...

You make a good analysis answering thebowl, but about the poll results, one can't read a poll like PB:s by just looking at which single option got the most votes.

# The more frequent but smaller "75+ guys every 5 days" have most votes of one single option, 504 votes.
# The less frequent but bigger "100+ guys every 10 days" and "150+ guys every 10 days" options together have 778 votes.

PB poll 2023-07-21 540p.jpg (56.97 KiB) Viewed 15045 times

So in fact less frequent but bigger scenes every 10 days have most votes, 778 against 504.

(Even if we add the odd "150+ guys every 5 days at $200 per month" alternative (which is not really comparable) the "bigger but less frequent" alternatives win by 778 against 669)

Now, this is just my comment on analysing the poll results. In my opinion a majority vote should never decide in artistic matters. And if on option "lost" by getting 504 votes, that is still 504 paying customers PB has to consider. It's good to get feedback from the members, but in the end PB has to decide which way they want to go anyway.

[piranorton]

^ First option is two bkks every 10 days, not one, which kind of makes it one bkk every 5 days, but one of them is big, the another is small. Basically this is what we have now, just with the same girl and half the guys.
Second option is one huge bkk every 10 days. That's what many people prefer here and it is the only infrequent option. Since the third one is not comparable (because of the price) and the fourth one is bugged (I think), actually if we eliminate these two, out of the two viable options the infrequent option is the winner, lol.

pb_poll.png (41.62 KiB) Viewed 14932 times