Jeez.. Carlota Guindal just can't let this go, another article from her attacking Torbe after his interviews with tv. Torbe should seriously sue this woman and/or The Spanish for libel! she attempts to refute what he has said with her own articles, but as we know they are missing facts about the case that don't fit into her common viewpoint of "big bad Torbe is guilty because of the police report" especially since she still relies on claims in the original report which date back to April.. it's November now!
http://www.elespanol.com/espana/tribuna ... 366_0.htmlOk so let's dismantle what she says shall we...
"I learned that she was underage when I was detained", he said in his interview with Antena 3, regarding the age of the protected witness TP2 which recorded having sex acts with her when she was 17 and so Torbe was reported by their parents. This statement is dismantled with the evidence incorporated in the summary proceedings by the Court of Instruction No. 29 of Madrid.
Specifically, Torbe has a conversation with another person, intercepted by the police on March 16 just days before being arrested in which he tells his plans to paralyze the complaint filed by the parents of TP2 for sharing a video of her topless whilst underage.
He was arrested April 25th, that is not "days" later! At no point in that conversation does Torbe mention the girl's age! Having a conversation with someone is not proof of anything. You can say you'd like to murder someone but it is not proof of murder, as I have said before, this does not show evidence of anything criminal!
NOT REFUTED!Torbe stated after his release from prison that the statements of protected witnesses are false. According to him, one of them did it out of spite having been a couple once and another witness, a minor, did so because their parents knew they wanted to be in porn, after the circulation through social networks of one video of her lifting her shirt and showing her breasts.
However, research is not only about the statements of the four protected witnesses. Police have testimonies of employees of Torbe, wiretaps that reveal criminal evidence and ex-workers' declarations of the director that support how threats were to record their videos.
Right.. because ex-employees can't lie right? Like "Isabel"? Nor can ex-girls who will say anything if they think they can gain some money from it or remove their videos despite authorising ownership to Torbe when they signed the model release. Wiretapping? Again.. more talking, doesn't always prove criminal intent and it depends on the context of the conversations.
NOT REFUTED!Even the investigation has been declared the father of a young disabled with Borderline Personality Disorder, which reported that Torbe had he demanded 8,000 euros to remove a video of his daughter
Again, model release signed by the girl, losses from production of video cost must be repaid. Not his fault she has BPD and is taking drugs plus the father did not want to press any charges anyway..
IRRELEVANT!Porn director has said after leaving prison that he has never offered drugs to any of the girls he has recorded. The minor said that he had been given a kind of white drink that left her stunned and which the director denies. "I gave her Coca-Cola", he said in one of his interviews.
But not only does the girl claim that the director gave him a drink with suspicious substances. A witness who contacted police after learning that Torbe had been arrested, under the initials AS, says that he "gave her a drink to calm which possibly had some substance which will inhibit their acts."
Also, researchers have NK's testimony, the girl who recorded one of the minor's videos with Torbe. She said to the police that at the meeting she was consuming narcotic substances and said TP2 showed discomfort when recording".
Carlota neglects to mention that said girl's drug test results showed she had been consuming cocaine and cannabis for 6 months before, during and after recording with him. What's more, whatsapp conversations from La Razon show the girl was eager to record her second video the next day with another girl and dildos, despite telling police she had been raped. That a drink that Torbe gave AS "might have contained something" means nothing.. was she drug tested? When did this happen? It is not hard for a girl to say she was drugged, but any testimony needs supporting evidence and no traces of any drugs were found on Torbe's properties. That TP2 was consuming drugs must have been by her own will and why she the toxicology results showed what they did.
NOT REFUTED!A fourth witness, CG, said Torbe prompted her to consume narcotics including cocaine, which he provided, to record some pornographic scenes with him.
LOL! The cocaine baron story again, total absolute horseshit!
NOT REFUTED!"I do not dedicate myself to prostitution" said Torbe in an interview with Antena 3. However, that's not what the police suspect. According to the latest conclusion of the researchers, there is a relationship between porn film director and some other investigated management services escorts, or flats / houses of prostitution " which could have been sexually exploited women ".
Torbe is investigated for various crimes such as sexual exploitation, human trafficking or money laundering. One of the lines of investigation of the police is that the director and producer also forced girls into prostitution in several homes in Madrid. The nerve center of the organization was located in the Madrid street of Irun. There was recording orgies, 'bukakes', videos and housed girls.
Hang on.. suspect or know? If Torbe is charged then surely they know for sure that Torbe is a "pimp".. or not? All of this story about prostitution comes from TP3 who has been shown to be a lying sack of shit. Recording bukkakes in a secret house? They were all recorded in the Putalocura studio in the building shared with other businesses that is now empty!
NOT REFUTED!"The girls were paid 12,000 euros to record bukkakes for three hours. They were sent a video showing what they had to do. They knew perfectly what they were doing" argued Torbe in one of his interviews after his release from prison. However, conversations tapped by the police during the investigation shows otherwise. "The girl does not know what's coming. Tomorrow we talk to the girl because she knows nothing at all" This is an excerpt from a conversation between two workers of Ignacio Allende.
They were subjected to various humiliations. According to eyewitnesses, they did not know why they came to Spain. As shown in the summary, one witness said the Central Brigade Against Trafficking in Human Beings of the Police that some women "came to Spain not knowing what their function would be, being coerced to recording the bukakkes". In addition, in conversations it appears that 12,000 euros was not paid, it was just 3,000 euros.
Torbe has said they knew perfectly what they were there for. However, the researchers point out that "after the ignorance comes the reality of what to do, they collapse into tears at the time of recording" includes a police report contained in the summary. The cameraman that recorded the scene could not bear it. "I do not want to burn crying and crying and crying and crying," he complained to one of the right hand men of Torbe, as is clear from the wiretaps contained in the summary.
Where does the €1200 figure come from? He said €9000! Ok so two guys from Torbe's company talking about some girl who "doesn't know anything" what is the context of this conversation, who are they talking about anyway? Is it possible that the girl knows what is happening but they don't know that yet.. yes! "Forced bukkakes" bullshit from the police report relying on testimonies from credible eyewitnesses like "Isabel" again who will say any old shit to disconnect themselves from the situation. Yet Carlota is seemingly not aware that since that police report (or doesn't care) that photos and videos have emerged of the Ukrainians touring Madrid. Taking selfies in Torbe's studios and the city for days on end whilst in the capital when they were supposed to be "clueless and abused". It has been said on the news in many places that the girls were paid €3000 per video up to a total of €9000 for three videos!
Ultimately the police would have examined the bukkake videos by now and if there was any evidence of girls being abused or forced it would surely have come out by now, only Torbe is out and barely a whisper has been mentioned about the Ukrainians aside from Carlota's propaganda about eyewitness statements of "battered prostitutes". As for the girl (Likely Katy) crying, of the 100 participants contacted and interviewed, none have been called to court to testify so whatever the cameraman was referring to could not have been that bad, otherwise everyone else would have witnessed it and would declare in court! So once again..
NOT REFUTED!This woman's bias is appalling, what is the point of presumption of innocence?? The man is not convicted of anything yet the way she talks about it, you'd think Torbe was the most dangerous man in Spain!