Kiki wrote:And it is aswell a fact that the same girls when they are at Yonitale don't fake because we would see it on the graph of their heart rates. This technology/algorythm (pleasure scale) has been developped in cooperation with a PHD in psychology and sexology studying female orgasm. And by the way, yes the heart rate is a way to see if you have an orgasm. It was already documented in research made by Virginia Johnson and William Masters in 1966 (reference https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_s ... onse_cycle).
And to be completed, some girls at Yonitale don't succeed to have an orgasm and we always say it. And our algorithm is improved everyday with the data we are collecting.
wow you managed to amuse me even more.
I feel like I'm reading some average spam. Have I won some inheritance and I need to send my bank information, along with processing fees?
It's way too easy, as I said, to break all the legs of your renewed argumentation.
You seem to use all the major argumentation techniques of spammers, first you establish a "fact" that is neither quantifiable, nor proven.
second, you appeal to inductive argument saying that girls don't fake because you would see it on their hr graph. As I said, it's not proven that the peak HR is the consequence of orgasm, even if higher HR is merely associated with orgasms.
thrid, you appeal to questionable authority: PhD in psychology/sexology was used as input for an algorithm to analyze orgasms via hr monitoring. This is just bullshit.
Your last argument, quoting johnson and masters is also very weak because:
1) they dont mention peak hr as proof of orgasm
2) their study is flawed in many ways: reduced sample of subjects (<400), reduced statistical sample of subjects (white, prostitutes...)
so please spare me the BS and just continue to shoot hot exclusive chicks and try to make them come, that's it. I dont want to see more pseudo-scientific marketing BS here. and by the way, you look hot.
