Certainly these documentaries will usually err on showing the negative side of porn or the negative reactions - but I think we all know that bukkake and gokkun is pretty 'extreme' and will most likely get a negative reaction from most women who are coming at it fresh. Like I mentioned above, even for my one girlfriend who had a genuine cum fetish and loved facials and the idea of a bukkake, the gokkun scenes were not her thing. That was a step too far! She liked the fantasy of a group of guys surrounding her and cumming over her - that she could be the centre of attention and turning on a ton of guys - but drinking down a bowl of cold cum was not a turn on in the slightest. I think even for us guys that like seeing that, it is the blowbang and bukkake that could be considered actually sexy, depending on the woman (think the way that SpermMania films their scenes), and the gokkun aspect, apart from normal swallowing, is more of a feat of perseverance that is a wonder to behold. We shouldn't trick ourselves in to thinking that that is a turn-on for the model. And indeed its obvious from a lot of comments here that some guys get off on the fact that a model can find it hard to do.
The Porn Laid Bare documentary is an interesting watch but definitely edited to evoke disgust and appear negative when it comes to Torbe's studio. Indeed that segment is proceeded by discussion about the failed case against Torbe, with an interview with a detective. The presenters are certainly going in to this situation with what could be said to be a bias. The documentary as a whole features a group of young people with varying degrees of porn exposure. For instance, one woman is classed as a 'Heavy porn user', another is interested in getting in to porn herself. The presenters that go to the studio though include one of the more porn-negative of the group - Anna (A 'non-porn user' - "Porn is at conflict with my feminist ideology" she states at the beginning). Torbe seems perfectly friendly, but they play ominous music throughout. The scene plays up that the men are older and the women are younger and how 'seedy' it all seems - for instance, the guy's wearing masks. They even ask Torbe to produce the model's ID at one point, which he does from a huge file of IDs. Torbe points out the gloryhole set, and the 'actual cum' around one of the holes (one of the visitors is shown washing his hands and saying it's 'minging' that they don't wash it! "There's cum on the walls, there's cum on the furniture" I had to kinda agree with that. Come on Torbe, get the anti-bac spray out!) The scene they watch is a PutaLocura gangbang scene with Yulia - she is 19 (they check the ID as I said) and she talks to the presenters and says she is happy to do the scene. The presenters then get Torbe to stop the scene, literally as Yulia is performing and ask her AGAIN if she is OK and she's like "Yeah, they literally already asked me". Yulia then is shown asking the presenters if THEY are OK, because they seem so concerned. She genuinely seems thrown by them and has to hug one of the presenters, Anna, who is crying, to make her feel better before they can go back to filming her scene. Then the presenters are shown crying again on their way home.
From the documentary as a whole, it seems that the presenters are just naive to the reality of being on a porn set and that what they are seeing is an act for the camera. At one point at a different studio, one guy says "I was excited to see how the anal was, and then i just kind of lost interest... at some stage it just felt awkward watching it". This is a job for the performers and film crew, not a sexy situation on set, and this seems to have been lost on the presenters at first. Having said that, the documentary as a whole (at least, the first episode which I have seen, which just concentrates on the porn industry) is eye-opening as to some of the problems with the porn industry in Spain and I am certainly not trying to discount the negative opinions of the presenters or the people they interview.