PremiumBukkake.com Discussion Thread

[Gregorious]

^In her #1 interview Giorgio say that that they will do a bigger bkk another day, so I guess you will get at least one more scene with her (as with most recent girls)...

Let's hope they filmed her #2 bkk differently, with less chaotic double and tripple cumshots with dicks in front of cam1 blocking her face, and more footage of one load at the time building up the mouthfuls, with a clear close view of her face and mouth...

[marmaduke]

this might not be a popular idea but i hope for more Nathalie Kitten.

I agree. She's lovely.

[Skreed]

this might not be a popular idea but i hope for more Nathalie Kitten.

Agree with you %100 not the best looking but by far did the best job that I've seen in a long time. Her behind the scenes was good too, she took some big thick loads you can tell she was getting a little overwhelmed but she kept going need more girls like this.

[gregory]

this might not be a popular idea but i hope for more Nathalie Kitten.

Agree with you %100 not the best looking but by far did the best job that I've seen in a long time. Her behind the scenes was good too, she took some big thick loads you can tell she was getting a little overwhelmed but she kept going need more girls like this.

agree but ohana keeps on saying she needs a 200 hundred loads scene hope they will satisfy her one day

[bigload]

I hope Angelique will come back for a big bukkake. Her last bukkakes were too easy for her

[foxtrotgolf77]

agree but ohana keeps on saying she needs a 200 hundred loads scene hope they will satisfy her one day[/quote]


Ohana said a 200 person bukkake. Not loads.

[piranorton]

I'd take Nathalie Kitten over Ohana any day. She has 6 scenes already and recently she tends to struggle and tremble with more than 1 load at a time, while a bunch of models from the last months can swallow big mouthfuls like water without a blink, but they were never able to reach their potential because of the lack of guys.

There is an update scheduled for Wednesday, what could that be? A smaller scene with Nathalie Kitten maybe?

[bigload]

Even if 200 guys would be able to join I dont think their studio has a capacity for 200 guys. It would have to be shot on different timings. It would be nice to see again a scene with 100 guys (150 loads) though and see if any girl can handle it. At the moment no girl was able to swallow it all without throwing up. Vicky we know went to the toilet several times, Kate also threw up, however I am not sure if it was only on 1 or if she actually managed to swallow it all in her second scene.
They do mega gloryhole so why can they not do mega bukkake as well like once a month?

[WAO137]

^ I would like to see 1 scene with 200 guys filming the whole process without cuts. A few hours movie? I don't mind

Like a Houston 500 (500 guys 620 ejaculations) worlds biggest gang bang record guinnes filmed in 90s but in bukkake way filmed in 4K

[Mr. Donkey]

I count myself among fans of this genre. However, I am not in favor of circus acts or making scenes just to break records. I believe that there is an optimal number of loads swallowed in an event, below which the scene is substandard. I may be alone in this, but I also think that increasing number of cumshots more than a certain quantity, no longer adds anything to the scene, and even spoils it. I estimate that optimal number of loads is somewhere between 75 and 100. Why don't boxing matches have 40 rounds? Why don't soccer matches last 3 hours? Well, because it would mean a great effort for the players and also the resulting show would be boring.

Above a certain level it is better to increase quality rather than quantity. So I'm not interested in super mega big scenes... But that's just my opinion

[Playabuoy]

I count myself among fans of this genre. However, I am not in favor of circus acts or making scenes just to break records. I believe that there is an optimal number of loads swallowed in an event, below which the scene is substandard. I may be alone in this, but I also think that increasing number of cumshots more than a certain quantity, no longer adds anything to the scene, and even spoils it. I estimate that optimal number of loads is somewhere between 75 and 100. Why don't boxing matches have 40 rounds? Why don't soccer matches last 3 hours? Well, because it would mean a great effort for the players and also the resulting show would be boring.

Above a certain level it is better to increase quality rather than quantity. So I'm not interested in super mega big scenes... But that's just my opinion

i am with you a 100 is a great number. these gokkun scenes are already extreme as they are why go further? these high freak numbers are just excessive.

freak show numbers dont make the scenes any better. theirs pb scenes with loads over 70 but the scenes sucks, theirs scenes under 70 that are great.

[Gregorious]

^^
^
I agree with both of you. Many loads is great, of course, but it only mean something up to a point. Then it just become a circus spectacle for the Guiness Book of Records. Hunting for sensational numbers and "records" instead of quality and sublime perversion is not the way I want PB to go.

[jackant]

Totally agree. This focus on 100 in nonsense.
It's the amount and mix of swallow and facials that make the magic.
Look at the classics. Original Lola scenes had around 50 loads and she was a cum covered mess just 15 loads into the bukkake. In Angela #2 she took more cum in the first 30 loads than most girls do in a lifetime.

[Gregorious]

^I can do without facials, would love to see some big bukkakes with only swallowing, but yeah, none of he original scenes where over 100 loads, and I don't think they where worse because of that...
-----------------------------------

Next scene coming up soon is Nathalie Kitten #2

NathalieK_02.jpg (54.98 KiB) Viewed 6465 times

NathalieK_05.jpg (55.46 KiB) Viewed 6465 times

NathalieK_06.jpg (48.71 KiB) Viewed 6465 times

NathalieK_11.jpg (52.79 KiB) Viewed 6456 times

NathalieK_17.jpg (51.31 KiB) Viewed 6456 times

[WAO137]

^ 103 loads

Nathalie Kitten.jpg (56.21 KiB) Viewed 6371 times