PremiumBukkake.com Discussion Thread

[JamesB]

I've said it before and I'll say it again. They could hire the hottest women in the world, swallowing hundreds of loads, but it wouldn't make any difference until they fix the lighting, video quality and camerawork (Gregorious has explained the problem below better than I could). You could have [insert your favourite celebrity] gulping down mouthful after mouthful, but if the final image is bad and the camerawork is all over the place, it's just boring to watch.

^4K or not, sadly it still gonna look like shit as long as they use a combination of

a) extreme studio lightning blowing out the picture and
b) unnatural "retouched look" color grading.

The opposite of natural clear crisp picture. I really hate it, ruining scene after scene.

Especially the sperm in the models mouth look like some kind of blurry undefined white paint instead or real sticky sperm. Do they deliberately want to make the scenes look as weak, harmless and unnatural as possible?

[Gregorious]

^Judging from the trailer Eme Jota #1 seems to be an improvement as far as the lighting and color grading goes. It actually looks pretty natural.

But we have to wait for the full scene to judge.
----------------------------------------------------------

Bruna Santos trailer: https://premiumbukkake.com/trailers/PB_424_brunasantos.mp4

Well, I'm looking forward more to Eme Jota, I like her "regular girl" look...

[xtripsnova]

^ Well that's a scene to avoid on 4K at all costs. The lower resolution the better. Her skin is a warzone.

[Gregorious]

^Yes, not easy on the eyes...

[xtripsnova]

^ Yep, this scene should be released as a podcast only

[Robbert1977]

21yo BRUNA SANTOS #1 - BUKKAKE

46 loads posted

How about EME JOTA’s bkk - not yet released?

[piranorton]

^^ Absolute disaster if this is the sort of girls we're going to be seeing regularly. If it's the sort of thing you're into, by all means, enjoy it.

What sort?

[Gregorious]

^ Yep, this scene should be released as a podcast only

That's mean, but very funny...
-------------------------------------

Btw, all the missing 4K videos are now posted, apart from Eme Jota bts and goodbye, but I guess those are on the way.

^ Well that's a scene to avoid on 4K at all costs...

Ironically Bruna was posted in 4K right away...

[Dare_50]

PB is not working anything new with background and camera angles. It's been 3 year with the same background and dull faded video shoots .
If there is something little to do with the lastest bukkake season is to get down and work on background and cameras, lightings to go ahead.

[Mack]

^ Well that's a scene to avoid on 4K at all costs. The lower resolution the better. Her skin is a warzone.

Jesus.
Poor girl.
Must suck to have poor skin.
Especially if it's due to no fault of her own.
Hopefully she doesn't have it for life.

[xtripsnova]

^ no fault of her own?
These women plaster themselves with cosmetics from young age. Their skin never breathes. Add to that bad food and bad rhythm of life, there you have it.

[MassiveFacials]

^^ Absolute disaster if this is the sort of girls we're going to be seeing regularly. If it's the sort of thing you're into, by all means, enjoy it.

What sort?

Extremely unattractive face, horrific tattoo right at the level of the diaphragm, terrible looking fake boobs. Like I said before, if you're into it, by all means enjoy it. But definitely not for me, there isn't a single redeeming aspect of what is brought to the table with this woman. And on top of how repugnant she is, it is a meager 46 loads - what a total joke.

[bigload]

how could kate rich look so much better even though it was recorded years ago… i mean video quality not the girl…ok the girl was well
anyways with AI technology it must be possible to re-encode the past fucked up scenes?

[piranorton]

Like I said before, if you're into it, by all means enjoy it. But definitely not for me, there isn't a single redeeming aspect of what is brought to the table with this woman.

It wasn’t clear to me which properties you were referring to. I mostly agree with you, except for the "extremely unattractive face" part, but fair enough, that’s a matter of personal preference. One redeeming quality might be her relatively good dental hygiene, which is, unfortunately, quite rare.

how could kate rich look so much better even though it was recorded years ago… i mean video quality not the girl…ok the girl was well
anyways with AI technology it must be possible to re-encode the past fucked up scenes?

Looks like it’s just the usual case of cranked-up contrast and saturation.

kate.jpg (110.91 KiB) Viewed 429 times

bruna_cc.jpg (120.26 KiB) Viewed 429 times

I have to say I'm not a big fan of the cold Kate Rich palette, I much prefer a warmer tone in pron, like the one in Min Galilea #4, which for me is still the best looking/graded PB video ever. It's very similar to what they delivered, but with less contrast and red. I don't know why the red channel is completely fucked up in their videos.

min.jpg (116.64 KiB) Viewed 410 times

bruna_cc_2.jpg (119.74 KiB) Viewed 410 times

[thebowl]

The amount of light is not the problem. It has a good amount of soft light ro deal with shadows as guys comedic and out. They can expose for this light. They don't have to be at f2.8 for a video like this. They could close the aperture a bit and this would also widen the depth of field keeping more in focus. The extra light gives them this versatility. I would say having a less shallow depth of field would be good. Following that, any issues with the appearance of the final video are done with colour correction and grading.

You cannot claim the original Ukrainian videos had this down. So many of those were either totally upgraded, or minimally adjusted. Some were lit well but left dark and dull due to poor colour correction. It was also totally inconsistent then. I think they are lighting it well now. It's some other things that can be adjusted. But honestly this is the least of my concerns. I'm definitely not jerking off to the lighting setup.
I think some guys here miss the zoom ins on the cum in her mouth, which Torbe used to do. He used a camcorder for that. They could still do that with a camera sometimes, but the way they use prime lenses on a gimbal, one of those guys would be having to get too close, so they need someone else zooming in like that with another camera. But with a less shake depth of field overall, you won't have an issue with one area in focus, like the cock, and the loads in her mouth with softer focus.