Pierre Woodman wrote:The producer critic the girls he knows personaly only and if he has serious arguments for it ...
But mentionned this girl is a prostitute without be sure it's herself who put these pictures is not a nice thing. There are thousand of fake escort profiles on the net.
I do not denie that she could have been an escort, she explained herself in the casting that she was travelling a lot and all is clear, but she told me she did not make it since 3 years which means there are many chances this site with this rate are not the truth ...
PW
I'm sorry, but this is bull-shit. You don't need to see a girl in private to know for sure whether or not she is top pretty.
Every professional in the xbiz or in fashion can tell from a photo if a (new) girl is pretty or has potential. Girls get assignments and get flown all over the world for photo shoots/editorials based on photos alone. These decisions are NOT based on real life encounters with a girl. Everyone knows this. I have never heard some agency pushing or telling a (potential) client who initially had no interest in a girl because they deemed her looks to be unsufficient:" well, she looks prettier in real life. You must meet her before saying no or forming an opinion on her looks". If a new girl wants to have a job in porn/fashion and e-mails a producer/agency a picture of herself, then that producer/agency will know within a second whether or not she is pretty enough for the job and if he thus wants to invite her for a job!!!! Pretending that this is not the case is lying. I mean, If I remember correctly "a certain producer" said one time that he immediately hopped on the plane when he saw a picture of a girl called Jessika Lux. For sure this was a BIG RISK then, seeing he had not yet met her in PRIVATE?

In other words, you can perfectly tell if a girl is top pretty or has potential without ever meeting her in real life.
Also, c'mon now, every man knows that women are like lawyers. They often already lie on the moment they move their lips.
Every girl can lie in such a way that she could be an Oscar winner for that performance. Every girl knows how to play men (especially men who are essentially strangers to them like producers and clients) to get what they want and know what they want to hear and then tell 'em exactly that. A man must really be a knucklehead to believe anything a girl says to them when it comes to such delicate matters as (previous) escort/prostitution life, let alone believe anything a verified (former) prostitute claims or says about it.
Be it how it is, the only thing I said is that she isn't worth EUR 1000 per hour. And seeing how this producer said she isn't " a tiger in bed", I don't think I'm far from the truth with what I said about her market value. Also, anyone slightly familiar with the Swiss/Austrian/German FKK Saunaclub scene can tell another man, that that girl is worth 50 per half hour if you compare her looks (and supposed mediocre performance like mentioned here) with her peers in that niche. Don't get me wrong, she isn't ugly. Not a bit, but she's average at best
if placed among her peers and seen in a prostitution perspective, or more so, if seen in the high-end EUR 1000 an hour prostitution league/level. Again, I suppose she's nice (and I never pretended otherwise) but combined with her mature age she's just not exceptional pretty looking and thus it doesn't warrant that amount of dough per hour when looked at from a broader perspective.
This does not mean that she cannot develop in a good performer later in her career for lower amounts of dough per scene. That's a whole nother story.
Maybe she is one of those girls who can't see porn/prostitution as a job and will perform better with the Marcus Schenkenberg type. It will be interesting to see and compare future scenes to analyze whether or not there is a change of interaction or physical explosion (if any) between her and other boys. Time will tell.