Vanessa G

[Am0rIn0]

Respect. Where others only talk and tease, this guy does it AND also get them to sign a model release.

[Pierre Woodman]

Thanks Am0rIn0 !!!

Ppolo, do I look live a man who has is brain in his dick ? Don't you think if something was not successful in my life, I will be stupid enough to continued to do it ?
I'm 50 years old and trust me I know what i'm doing, and I am just so happy when I read your post. It's orgasmic for me that you don't even think that if my chart shows the sales and not the streaming there is probabily a good reason !!! I love people giving me advice like if they was seat down on a chair and see my website statistics differentely than I could see it myself !!!
But it's not so important in fact, what you and my competitors are thinking about me, but just try to think about how many girls like Vanessa G will just not even been in front of your eyes if I was not doing thoses "stupid interviews" who have no sens for you but a lot for me ...

PW

[janusfp]

This is a quote from the "Angelica" thread:

Coming soon: Czech babes on ClubSandy.com
Dear Members, we've received quite a few letters asking for more Czech babes. After reading all your requests, we decided to shoot in Brno this Friday and have already booked a number of stunners, including Tracey Lindsay, Vanessa Angel, Enza, Gina Devine, Iwia, Kari, Angelica Kitten and Victoria Sweet. The new scenes will be added to ClubSandy.com from next week. As we plan to shoot in Prague regularly in the future, we would like to hear your model suggestions! Drop us a line and we'll shoot your favorites!

This Vanessa Angel: Is this our babe ?

[pplolo]

It is good to know you can get orgasmic just by reading me!
Streaming has never been a metrics,maybe if you want better insight about customer behavior there is a lot of software designed to tailor better tracking about what people likes.
I am sorry but i can see a hell lot of girls like this one or even much better at hegre or metart and if i want to see that i will go there.
And if i want to see this one,she does better things elsewhere,the blowjob scene is quite useless but her scene at wetandpuffy is really good.
So your interview castings are quite a waste of time to edit,or at least let them warm up on their own so at least you have something to show if they decide to do only solo and want to release them.

Your are here for 30 years for sure,but porn is now almost mainstream and the level has now been substantially raised.You got young people no longer afraid of shooting porn.
If you see danejones,sexart,babes.com,joymii,x-art,nubilefilms these guy are dedicated 100% to editing and filming scenes,so you cannot beat them .
People only will come to you if you can show full castings because this is what you do that others cannot totally replicate.
And you do not need to release crap castings just to feed the goose everyday.

[STEMCELL]

fanboy --- give me a break.
"good editing" ?
Is this the reason these artsy fartsy sites never do anal with their pretty girls as it would be to dirty to edting out ?
The sex on these sites is so passionless and boring as if a housewife married 30years with the same guy would suck the cock of her husband only because she´s used to do so once a week

Why do you compare raw gonzo porn with this kind of soft erotic? You can´t compare it!

[STEMCELL]

noooo cesky
she´s from Ljubljana, Slovenia

Vanessa From: Karup's Private Collection Age: 19 Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia
http://www.karup.com/gal225/vanessa/index.htm

[trevorgordon]

great girl!

[pplolo]

Wild ride at clubseventeen!



http://www.seventeenvideo.com/

[STEMCELL]

she´s biking to Budapest to do a hardcore scene with Pierre . and she already has the perfect outfit

[Vaudou]

Sure,if you want to be an advocate,first read what the other camp says.
I said it was useless spending time editing castings interviews nobody watch.
Video editing is time consuming and it is waste of time editing content nobody watch.
Same for scenes according to the top100 you should spend 6% of your time shooting this kind of content.
Of course you need to do a lot of interviews to get some "full casting" to release.
But only edit and release the full ones and just trash the rest.
What i said is based on facts not my personal view.
And if a girl is out of business and you have some full casting just do what seems to be obvious.

Personally i understand his point of view.

I don't care about the casting stuff when there is no hc after and i hate all the teasing strategy by woodman but what i dislike the most is the directing. Like other sites he has a few really beautiful women and the other are ugly ones (look the pic preview of castings, many girls are fuckin gross). But when he have a gem, he often manages to spoil the scenes by awful camera work where you can't see a damn thing. It seems he only fucks the girls for him and not for the audience.

In my collection i have only three new castings (jessica lux, lola striker and nikita bulgaria) coz in these ones he made some effort to purpose a good looking view for the audience.

For example look at the Rose delight stuff, a bunch of failed scenes imo, the povs by Picasso are much much better. She's very much into it like in woodman scenes (so it's not a privilege of him to make the girl horny) but the difference is that you can clearly watch her sucking or fucking in these ones. And do you remember the wrong teasing with Peneloppe Ferré where she looks beautiful? I paid for the casting (my bad) and all i saw was an average looking girl, who meanwhile had lost his nice make up and haircut, fucked in a room with no lights.

And about the success of his site i'm happy for him but sad for me coz he will never change his mind about making quality scenes or not.

[STEMCELL]

lol >>> you should be in the next Oscar jury

[Pierre Woodman]

And about the success of his site i'm happy for him but sad for me coz he will never change his mind about making quality scenes or not.

Vaudou, it's more simple than that, it's just some people have a brain enough big to understand if something is real I DO NOT DECIDE OF THE MAKE UP SHE WILL ARRIVED IN THE ROOM WITH and also I DON'T HAVE ALWAYS LIGHT WITH ME IN EVERY SITUATION BUT EVEN IF I HAVE IT I MUST SHUT IT DOWN WHEN THERE ARE NO "OFFICIAL" CAMERA OR THE GIRL WILL UNDERSTAND WHAT I DO !!!

So yourself you're in full contradiction with yourself because Nikita Bulgaria and Jessika Lux castings are a little similar yes, but Lola Striker is the same like hundred of others with camera hidden in a box on a table and natural light !!! So I think your critics are not based on serious appreciations and far to be very smart !!!
By the way Peneloppe Ferré casting is one of the top sale of the site and one of the most apreciate by my members ...
I suggest you to watch the video of Casting.XXX with perfect lighting and perfect view of action.

PW

[Maxximo]

Good news:
Vanessa masturbating at TLE
http://www.thelifeerotic.com/model/vanessa-m/
Enjoy

[rashidnz]

Hello

I just want to say, she is even more beautiful in person
than her photos would suggest

Thank You Pierre
I enjoyed the time I spent with you and all the lovely ladies Blue,Caprice,Cherry,Rose and Miyuki

[trevorgordon]