eurobabeforum.com

According to you people, should we create or keep different sections for different groups of girls or simply add them all to EBI COLLECTORS?
So that fans of glamour babes with just a few "slips" into hc (our original concept) don't have to wade through pages of quadruple penetrations and viceversa?
So that 80s and 90s models would have a different section (a good example of this is the vintage erotica forum)? To keep things clean and, MOST OF ALL, to keep the forum browsable.

Just let me know what you think, I'm about to tweak with the Forum configuration and opinions are welcome.

Lorenzo

I've said the soft core girls should have their own section several times, OK I usually go too far and say they shouldn't be classed as EuroBabes. However I admit your right that if a girl is primarily a soft core girl with just a couple of hardcore sets then she probably should stay in the soft section.

Also your idea about the 80s & 90s girls is good. I would have suggested though put all the retired girls in their own sub-forum .

How about having 3 sub-sections under the EuroBabe section
"Hard-Babes" for the more extreme girls,
"Glam-Babes" for the ones that only occasionally go hard or who only do the glam porn like X-art,
"Ex-Babes" for the retired babes, maybe you could use and rename the "The lost Babes of EBI" section since that basically does that job.

I realize this last one may be a lot of work but it sounds like your considering doing that already.

There will be some babes who don't easily fall into one section or another they will just have to be decided on an individual basis (EG Dido Angel basically a Glam-Babe but does too many hardcore sets to be describe as occasional, has been DPed and seems to like doing Watersports so some could argue she should be in the hard section.)

I would suggest the "Other Babes" section should have it's own "Add a Babe" sub-forum.

How about having a section for production companies/Producers so all the threads like "The official KOZODIRKY.CZ Thread" , "Additions for FAQ / DVC / FND / JOT sites", "Classic Private & Woodman Girls" could be put together rather mixed in with the general eurobabe section.

The forum definitely needs rethinking.

I think the "Vintage Babes" forum, in most cases, implies that most if not all those girls are now retired.

Ok for different categories, I'd say. This forum seems obsessed with hard anal and abuse (I'm not judging, it's still good porn). But I don't like the idea of it defining EBI, at all.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=iqlVPaZYOzQ

after a view years of passive smoking i gave some soft input lately, as i call the majority of girls doing porn nowadays Analia Plain (Virginia Plain, if You like resp. as a Roxy Music-lover);
butt my main concern is all the wasted time reading a majority of contributions written in woody english give me an A, although history told not even Billy Bragg could change the world

sbando wrote:So that 80s and 90s models would have a different section

sbando wrote:I think the "Vintage Babes" forum, in most cases, implies that most if not all those girls are now retired.

I thought you meant you were going to call the vintage babes section " 80s and 90s models" so suggested there should just be one "Retired girls" section otherwise there would need to be a post 2000 retired babes section.

sbando wrote:Ok for different categories, I'd say. This forum seems obsessed with hard anal and abuse (I'm not judging, it's still good porn). But I don't like the idea of it defining EBI, at all.

I originally registered when EBI was mostly about "glamor babes with just a few "slips" into hc " and this set EBI apart from the other BBSs. To a certain extent porn it's self has changed in that there were lots of soft only girls and lots of hard core girls but nothing in between. It was always a pleasure to see a soft girl try the nasty side but these days I doubt most girls think definitely no hardcore. With the rise of the Glam porn sites over the last few years it seems as the girls who would have been soft only girls in the past are more willing to give hard core a go (even on a quite regular basis).

It was thinking about this that prompted me to ask this question "So what proprtion of models do hardcore?" here Since Hard babes and Glam/hard babes may be no more common than they ever were.

Time frame is probably better. By act can have some odd groupings.

I think the current format is ok. Just keep adding the babes to EBI collectors, Who's that girl and Add a babe sections.

If there are too many then wait till they do a few scenes + few months in the industry.

Problem with classifying babes by their acts is what happens when softcore babe becomes gaping babes? And if too many girls are doing extreme scenes then that is reflection of Euro porn biz and consumer demand. After all even Playboy changed from showing just tits and ass to showing pussy.

Vintage models - I would assume it means pre-2000. But most of the girls from that era are not on the forum but are listed on eurobabeindex which seems fair enough.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it - my 2 cents.

Same as arnoldsty basically:
Its good as it is now.
Keep softcore models apart.
New section for vintage = pre-2000 girls would be great. Maybe list all pre-2000 Woodman babes just there, too.
Sections for retired post-2000 girls doesnt make sense because many girls retire and come back.

we need the soft core section urgently there must have been 50+ of them added recently

In principle it seems like a good idea, however, I think the forum works great as it is. Then again I like seeing both soft pics (especially the latest additions) and HC.

My only advice would be not to make too specific sub-categories (stick with very broad) because then the urge to make everything hyper-specific will grow, and who knows what will emerge. The guiding principle is like said earlier, 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it'

Vintage pre-2000 would be an excellent thread. There's a few threads already on the forum with lists like that but having a central location for all that sounds cool

Also, having a 'soft' category thread will not stop people writing stuff like "I want to see her DAP'd with giant gapes"

To some of us one is sexier then the other ( and vice versa)

I suggest "Porn" and "Erotica" ( it reflects better how people react)

You chose which is which ( I am using lesbian bondage scenarios since they are my favored)