by Sir Noel Plum on Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:28 pm
Not an easy question to answer. I have plumped for 1080p but it is a lot more complicated then just resoolution for me.
For starters, i would rather see a decent 720p bitrate than an overextended 1080 file. Case in point, i have subbed to several kink sites the last few months and they produce some great material and also some great quality. However, rather than go the 1080p route they produce two le els of 720p, usually a shitty noisy artifact ridden one of arounf 500-800mb and one which does the scene justice of around 2-3gb. Now, given that theis scenes are around the hour marker i would MUCH rather have 2.5gb spread over 720 lines than over 1080 at a lower bitrate: more lines is good but more lines of noise is no advance on less lines of quality image.
Tbh the difference between 720 and 1080 is really rather tiny compared to the difference crap lighting, poor bitrates and poorencoding makes.
Someone mentioned Brazzers and for, in terms of picture quality they are the standard to aspire to, amongst porn sites. Some evil angel stuff (mike adriano and manuel ferrera especially) is also great in 1080p.
On the other hand,i am giving up o. 21sextury. My annual sub runs out any day and i wont be renewing. The analteenangels scenes are oversaturated and noisy, anything by the gapeland crew looks either dull or has a colour cast (like they dont even give a shit what it looks like), buut the real tragedy is Assholefever and DPfanatics. Those sites are usually well lit and produced but then sent out as super-crapola 1080p that descends i to mush if anyone moves above a snails pace. Even if they are too tight to upload larger files if the made a 720p mp4 of the same file size as the 1080p wmv format they use they could really improve matters.
SNP