eurobabeforum.com

I have found this on the net



the guy said this is some screens of a bj movie with Sandy
at first time i thought it was bullshit but when i have looked carefully
YES IT IS SANDY !!

My God !!
i had heard some time ago she has done some more explicit material but never able to find anything

what do you thing about this ?

It appears that Sandy did perform a blow job on Andrew Youngman in that scene which you probably know is called "When girls go bad". The scene also stars Mya Diamond.

Wikipedia has reported about that scene saying that when Youngman ejaculated, he came in Mya's mouth and on Sandy's pussy. Mya then did a cum swap with Sandy.

Even though that scene appears to be tagged by "sex view" I am pretty confident its actually a 2004 21st Sextury scene or maybe a Sapphire Erotica scene. I have located this scene and will check it out because its interested me.

I'll let you know later which site its from so that you may get it.

However, Sandy has never gone further than this and at this stage in her career I doubt she will ever go further. There is an interesting observation made by Kiraly Katalin (Cathy Moore) on her topic at the Viv Thomas forum which is worth considering......

Katalin something along these lines... "Most models in this business start and within two to three years are no more because they do all hard scenes and soon no one wants to see them anymore as they are overused. Most of the models doing softer scenes last for many many more years because the demand never decreases".

She has a point and Katalin has now been performing for seven years. Sandy has been performing for nine, ten years and Sandra Shine the same (although Sandra has done a hard scene once). To last in this business sometimes its best not to give it your all!!!

Steve wrote:To last in this business sometimes its best not to give it your all!!!

That´s a philosophy that works only if a girl is really really beautiful and has good marketing tools behind her. At least in Europe, that is.

So, what about Claudia Jamsson ? She certainly gave her all. Is she retired now ?

But the point is, the actual wear and tear on the body of hard sex, lots of it, and anal, and also the effect on the immune system of foreign matter, must take its toll after a while and a number of penetrations.

Silvia Saint still works but only g/g, because I presume it is easier, less strain for her now slightly older body (32), but a lot of girls are retired by 25, or even earlier. Also, I assume that a female having contact with a female is less of a strain on a woman's immune system than lots of male contact and cum.

There may be a physical limit to the amount of sex a woman can have as a pornstar before it affects their health.

They might also feel mentally drained and have porn burnout.

I..........WANT..............INFO............ON FULL SCENE!!!!!!!!

omfg!!!!!! i wanna see that..even if its just 5 seconds or whatever im hoping its a lot more though

Definitely Steve you are right She only take dick in hand on video 4 times(2 with Frank Major,Andrew Youngman,and Westley)and never went furder This is a old scene divided in 3 parts(When girls go bad)that everyone can see at clubsandy but...this part is deleted in the site,and they hide the blowjob to Sandy and not to Mya.So...is this a kind of steeled backstage??? ...Why they give this piece of video to other website???...Where we could found it ???

just type in eMule search :When girls go bad and voila!! clipa has about 370 Mb and it is in two versions all and 3 parts

Yes but this part isn´t in any clip

Yeps, its on p2p but usually we don't mention that on here, lol.

In regards to the body being overly used, that is not really a realistic possibility due to the fact that most people have as much sex as a pornstar in their private lives anyway.

Its 95% to being over exploited. A fresh new model comes along, she is adorable and everyone loves her. She will do anything required and loves sex and goes from being a relative newcomer to mainstream star in a few months with her scenes appearing everywhere as everyone clammers to get her on their site to get new members.

People chase her around for about a year trying to get scenes and she is working that often it starts to effect her performances (i.e. as mentioned burnout). People then get critical saying "she used to be great but recently has become a bit boring and all her scenes are the same". Total over exploitation and everyone has seen too much. Suddenly she goes from being the big wow to just another babe that everyone has heard of.

Meanwhile, another fresh new model comes along and bang, the cycle starts again.

With girl girl scenes it different. They keep a following of people wanting them to go further and wanting to see hardcore (this topic highlights that extremely well as we are debating hardcore scenes and has she done it, blah, blah for a model who has been around for 10 years. Do hardcore models get that kind of attention!). Also with girl girl only scenes they wont get as much work and retain that level of freshness. Most of them seem to run successful single model sites too (just an observation).

Now, the beauty related comment is debatable as beauty is in the eye of the beholder. What one person finds attractive may repulse another. I think Eve Angel is very attractive and I also think Sandra Shine is. I have never been a big fan of Sophie Moone, or Sandy or even Katalin. I am not saying they are horrible or don't do good scenes, just they are not in my spectrum of viewing.

I sometimes look at the model pages on EBI wondering if some of the models really have a following. At the same time, preference is not just about the model, but its also about what she does and how she works. I am not a big fan of anal or dp or anything past that level and prefer to watch how they move, their face, etc. Totally different to how other people percieve the perfect pornstar. To some, unless they gape and take two dicks up the ass they are not really a pornstar. Its all about preference and that is what makes this industry so dynamic.

I'll find it guys. I have always had a knack at finding the impossible. Not sure how I will be able to let everyone see it, but I'll post images when I finally locate it.

Give me a day or two.

Steve POST this 19seconds to some place to us watched

Steve wrote:Its 95% to being over exploited.
(...)
People chase her around for about a year trying to get scenes and she is working that often it starts to effect her performances (i.e. as mentioned burnout). People then get critical saying "she used to be great but recently has become a bit boring and all her scenes are the same". Total over exploitation and everyone has seen too much. Suddenly she goes from being the big wow to just another babe that everyone has heard of.

Meanwhile, another fresh new model comes along and bang, the cycle starts again.

I dont see anything bad with this. Also for the model todays shorter careers have a lot of good points, i.e. she can earn loads of money in just one year and than move further with her other plans like education, travelling, looking for someone to found a family etc.

A softcore career or course is quite different. It sure means much less money in most cases. But it better allows for a long term committement. And thinking about it again you are right that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. However, I bet a softcore career is not really open for a lot of Eurobabes due to their non-model looks, still.

As you say, it all contributes to the dynamics of the glamour and porn biz.
There is something for everyone - and that´s good.



Btw, I really had a good laugh reading superdupers worn out body and too much b/g body fluent exchange theory.

I agree with Steve's comments, but I think dap addict points out some good things too.

It does seem as though the cycle of newer adult models is shorter and the progression from softcore to hardcore (whatever stage that may be) is quicker and the model isn't around as much.

This is true not only in Europe but also America (to me, it's very pronounced in America - a fresh new face comes along and within a year, she's doing the horizontal hanky but is quickly gone from the scene and considered "overused" or "burned out").

I think Sandy's approach has been rather impressive - that she's basically steered clear of straight out b/g hc scenes, with some notable exceptions where she "almost" does something. For her to be around 10 years and still have the following she does (obviously a big one since a lot of people on the forum state they would like to see her do b/g), is amazing!

But I think dap addict makes a good point in that the quicker turnaround with the cycle might not be all that bad for the model and her personal life goals beyond the adult industry.

And a softcore career might not be all that bad - even if the money isn't as much as doing hardcore. There are some American adult models that are exclusively softcare - well, OK, they do masturbation, toy, perhaps g/g scenes, and they've got the benefit of an "official" web site. Their careers are rather long and they don't seem to suffer from any lack of b/g scenes. An example of this would be Sandee Westgate. Then again, it is possible that because Sandee Westgate is very beautiful that her looks alone compensate for that, but again, that's debatable.

And on the whole individual's beliefs as to what constitutes pornography, I firmly agree with steve. I remember a discussion with a friend a few years back, who argued that because American adult model Nikki Nova did not do b/g or even hard g/g scenes, she wasn't really a porn star whereas Jenna Jameson was a genuine porn star. I disagreed and said Nikki Nova was a porn star because she posed naked and did do some toy insertion and touching of herself. So, it's all individual perspective - and the industry is so large that it can accommodate everyone's preferences.

I'm convinced Sandy's crew leaks some B/G crap every two years or so when her site takes a membership hit.

I can count at least three times where she and her crew said Sandy' B/G debut.

It goes back to what I said before repitition is boring and her site maintains afloat due to the likes of Hope, Blue Angel and Bambi taking dick.

Euro Porn Fan wrote:I'm convinced Sandy's crew leaks some B/G crap every two years or so when her site takes a membership hit.

It´s not crap, just marketing.
On a side not for Steve, Sandy we have to remember well, is part of another glamour/porn girl generation. If she would start doing softcore in Budapest now in 2007 I doubt she would be able to keep such a fellowing until 2017.