eurobabeforum.com

This is the "If I would be a porn producer" thread...

Let me start:


If I would be a porn producer:

- I would now start filming in HD only and selling BluRays only (25 $ a piece).
- I would make gonzo stuff only with anal in every scene.
- I would produce by the rule "class instead of mass". So maybe only 4 scenes per movie but then first class girls and not 3 scenes with girls you would skip cause they look like the facility manager wife.
- I would put in half and hour behind the scenes as bonus material (+photo gallery, cumshot loop, 3 trailers of other movies, short interviews with the girls).
- I would have a website, too. There you can find the single scenes, but not the behind the scenes and other bonus stuff.
- I would not make lesbian stuff or shemales or gay movies.
- I would make it possible that all movies my company released will never be sold out, so you can buy older movies even after 5 years.
- I would not put viruses on my BluRays.
- I would release a anal smashing must see movie with Sarah, Sasha, Barbariska, Meggy, Nastia & Olga Barz (as male performers: Jean-Ives, Timur, Joachim, Greg Centauro, Frank Major).
- I would... [to be continued]

I would be filming myself with Sarah, Barbariska, Meggy, etc. for a POV series and wouldn't have time to post here!

Well I'd be shooting all my scenes with laura Lion!!

(1) I'd scour the planet for better, younger, hungrier male talent than is currently out there and take a chance on some untested guys rather than just plumping for "safe" workmanlike veterans.

(2) I'd move away from gonzo and try to create simple everyday storyline porn that ties in with the fantasies of the average man by giving a context to the sex other than it just taking place on a porn set.

(3) I'd try to bring out the personalities of the girls in the films a bit.

(4) I'd edit my scenes a lot more than most. 20-25 mins each max with sharp cuts to each new position and the final cumshot, which wouldn't take place about 5 mins after the guy has started stroking himself unconvincingly to climax.

(5) I'd instantly fire any male performer who puts his hand on a girl's throat/slaps/manhandles/generally acts like an aggressive arsehole and who doesn't appear to be having the time of his life.

(6) I'd make the cum-on-heels cumshot a regular fixture.

I'd be the best porn director ever!

Vulture wrote:(
(5) I'd instantly fire any male performer who puts his hand on a girl's throat/slaps/manhandles/generally acts like an aggressive arsehole and who doesn't appear to be having the time of his life.

And I'd buy all your movies

all Vulture's points is mine
exept cum-on-heels
cum-on-heels in every scene it's kinda nightmare..

ass wide open wrote:Jean-Ives, Timur, Joachim, Greg Centauro, Frank Major

it's old russian joke: "Al Pacino, Matt Damon, Edward Norton and Dmitry Kharatian in new smashing blockbuster "Who the fuck is Dmitry Kharatian?"

Vulture wrote:(2) I'd move away from gonzo and try to create simple everyday storyline porn that ties in with the fantasies of the average man by giving a context to the sex other than it just taking place on a porn set.
(...)
(6) I'd make the cum-on-heels cumshot a regular fixture.

Sort of contradicting, but I really like these...and this one:

ass wide open wrote:- I would make gonzo stuff only with anal in every scene.

Apart from this I would shoot more dap, but not dap only.
Not necessarily gonzo, I like Vultures approach...
...but for sure cut all pussy-only sex and include it into a special interest dvd series later.

I would make a series based on the old US game show The Dating Game. With the winner getting to bang the contestant right on stage in front of an audience. Sure to produce plenty of bloopers/outtakes, but occasional a stud is born. If a new male talent could perform under those conditions, they are serious stud material.

Of course, I would always have a stunt dick ready if the "winner" is not "up" to his duties. Oh, oh.. and on occasion, if the starlet is up for it she gets gangbanged by all the contestants.

Vulture wrote:(1)

(6) I'd make the cum-on-heels cumshot a regular fixture.

I'd be the best porn director ever!

WTF?! You lost my interest.

Simple.
Anal, DP, DAPs, ass fisting, gapes, pissing & facials only.
Anything else is softcore!

I wouldn't do the cum-on-heels shot every time, I just said I'd make it a regular fixture.

I'd mix it up between facial, cum-on-arse in doggy and cum-on-heels. All brilliant in different ways.

Variety is the spice of life.

if i would be porn producer - i would be BEST ONE
and take girls from Juliana (hihihi)

maxxx wrote:I wouldn't buy any of your movies.

Why not?

maxxx wrote:Just compare your and ass wide open's aproach and the answer is more than obvious.

Well, it isn't really. But if you want to give an oblique answer that's fair enough.

What would go in your movies maxxx?

Vulture wrote:(1) I'd scour the planet for better, younger, hungrier male talent than is currently out there and take a chance on some untested guys rather than just plumping for "safe" workmanlike veterans.

(2) I'd move away from gonzo and try to create simple everyday storyline porn that ties in with the fantasies of the average man by giving a context to the sex other than it just taking place on a porn set.

(3) I'd try to bring out the personalities of the girls in the films a bit.

(4) I'd edit my scenes a lot more than most. 20-25 mins each max with sharp cuts to each new position and the final cumshot, which wouldn't take place about 5 mins after the guy has started stroking himself unconvincingly to climax.

(5) I'd instantly fire any male performer who puts his hand on a girl's throat/slaps/manhandles/generally acts like an aggressive arsehole and who doesn't appear to be having the time of his life.

(6) I'd make the cum-on-heels cumshot a regular fixture.

I'd be the best porn director ever!

Ok I will answer for me, but maybe maxx points will be the same.
I wouldn't buy your, too.
The reasons are clear:

some comments to your point:
(1) ok some new male performers are good, but they should have the quality as the guys I mentioned... so I wouldn't do a casting for male performers. So If you know the new males are good fuckers, than it would be ok.

(2) that is the big problem in your list.... move away from gonzo and putting in story??? wtf- porn and story doesn't work together. story dialogues in porn are mostly that lame and wasting just time of fucking action.

(3) that point is ok. I agree with you.

(4) sharp cuts???? no, no, no!!! sharp cuts are a turn off... I want to see the whole scene, when the girl moves from one position to another and so on

(5) slapping, spitting and behave to agressive is not a must in porn. but in gonzo porn it should allways clear who is the boss and that's the man. the girls are there for sucking cock, getting pounded and showing cum splattered gaping asshole at the end of a scene. - btw I like slapping and harder fucking more the cuter the girl is. e.g. a rougher scene with sarah or sasha is more fun to watch the same hard stuff with a nasty but not that cute clara g...
example for a good scene with hard fucking and slapping: http://www.indexxxed.com/165100/movies.php?id=1469
example for a good scene with hard fucking and slapping: http://www.indexxxed.com/165100/movies.php?id=2050
and here an example where it doesn't work for me cause the girl is not realy nice, so slapping doesn'T make the scene better: http://www.indexxxed.com/165100/movies.php?id=568&k=42

(6) cum on heels is not my favourite... cum should be swallowed or deep pumped into the ass and squirted out


but ok, tastes are different and this is just what I like and doesn't mean this is the only way of thinking