Don't you think cumshots are overrated?

[IMaRetArd]

eh...well im not so sure that a cumshot is required, but i do think its incredibly difficult to make a scene good enough to be "complete" without a cumshot. i mean its called the money shot for something right? its the selling finale.

[brawnypandora0]

Not sure, I think producers underate this key moment these days. Sometimes getting the position totally wrong. Cum can be hard to aim, and often it is wasted
on the subject of natural etc... well the idea of sex is to reproduce so surely a cumshot is required? I want a scene to end with a climax.
Not that a anal porn shoot comes anywhere near reality

cum on face threadhttp://www.eurobabeforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=11125.

Why doesn't an anal porn shoot come anywhere near reality? I think the only difference is that I wear a condom and the actors don't?

[gape]

eh...well im not so sure that a cumshot is required,

perhaps reword to ejaculation.

Why doesn't an anal porn shoot come anywhere near reality? I think the only difference is that I wear a condom and the actors don't?

Obviously girls are turning up at your front door wanting to be slapped, deepthroated and fucked anally on the kicthen counter. And your mate happens to turn up, so you do a dp.

[dap-addict]

Not sure, I think producers underate this key moment these days. Sometimes getting the position totally wrong. Cum can be hard to aim, and often it is wasted

Its quite obvious that directors instruct their actors more about what to do in the beginning of a scene than at the crucial end.
Also too many actors seem to have no clue or just not to care at all how they shoot their cum at the girls. They choose bad positions for aiming results, they shoot from too far away or too close etc. Not to speak about directors constantly booking actors who dribble a few drops out instead of shooting big loads.