BigBear wrote:Porn producers aren't exactly helping much either with their generic movies and webscenes and using the same setpieces over and over all the time. Sure, they say it's done out of necessity and to at least give some taste of freshness to it all they try bringing in more newbies. Of course this in itself is another double edged knife as these newbies are simply more cheap to work with then more established names in the business, while in effect creating even more competition for those established names who are already have been struggling these last years in finding enough work. No wonder many of them are moving on to the more profitable escorting.
But being generic by itself isn't enough to fail. Brazzers is pretty much
the current champion of generic porn, and they make money hand over fist (even outside their parent company's well-known affiliation to tube sites). What they do is they make "generic" look good - good lighting, sets that look interchangeable but not cheap, etc. And they're almost obsessed with casting recognizable names over and over, rarely newcomers. The Brazzers forum population is generally pretty much on board with that approach, but even there you find a significant number of people who'd rather see more faces - and they typically have to beg for months until the producers hear their wishes.
As for those (like Woodman) whose niche is exactly the opposite, rushing a new face through the revolving porn door every 48 hours...uh, if you're catering to an audience that is obsessively looking for a new thrill all the time, you probably shouldn't be surprised if that audience doesn't stay with you long and/or starts looking for an even faster progression of thrills via filesharing.
Plenty of people are totally sick of Brazzers adding new Shyla Stylez, Jayden Jaymes, Phoenix Marie etc. scenes like clockwork, but those girls are highly popular and people who are particular fans of them seem loyal enough to stay with the network for years as long as their favourites show up in new updates regularly. In essence, Brazzers is one huge conglomerate of pornstars' personal websites, except the girls are mere employees, not owners of their scenes as they would on their actual personal sites. And it works.
And the reason it works is something Vulture touched on:
At present, my biggest problem is that I just can't find enough decent stuff (ie that doesn't involve girls being battered into submission or weird fruit being plunged into prolapsed arses) to buy. In pushing the boundaries, porn for me is failing a massive chunk of its core market and then looking to pass the blame to a minority of freeloaders.
Ultra-generic porn of the Brazzers variety is getting derided pretty much everywhere that porn fans are talking about their porn likes and dislikes (e.g. here or ADT), but what all of us like to ignore is that we're a tiny, tiny part of the porn-consumer universe. If you polled the posters here, you'd find that the majority prefers anal over regular b/g, and a significant percentage loves DP or even DAP scenes, and a whole bunch of other stuff that's on the extreme side. (It's not much different on ADT, except for less DAP interest.) Poll 100 people who watch porn but have never visited any message board and you'll likely find that the overwhelming majority doesn't care to see anal in their porn, and 95+ of them would be turned off or even disgusted by DP, let alone DAP. These are the people who are still paying for their porn, because they don't care to jump through the filesharing hoops anytime they get the urge to see a nice vanilla scene by one of their favourite stars. (In fairness, I'll add that the subset of people who don't have any favourite stars and will wank off to just anything are the main target audience of the tube sites. But I suspect those people wouldn't be spending any money on porn either way, they'd just find something else, even the proverbial Victoria's Secrets catalog.)
And the rise of the escorting business dovetails with all that, because by and large the punters also aren't interested in recreating porn circus acts and just want to get their fuck on with a hot girl, basically the real-life version of a vanilla porn scene at best. (And I don't buy that it's just really rich guys who are taking advantage of it; going by the well-frequented escorting thread plenty of porn girls can be had for ~200 Euros per hour, which is hardly breaking anybody's bank if done occasionally.) So, sure, filesharing is hurting the porn business, but IMO in part the developments of the last few years have simply served to point out where the industry has failed a large part of its would-be consumers for years and years.
The choice for seeing hot chicks naked is no longer just between watching Cinemax on TV or buying an expensive porn DVD you may never watch again after the first time. Tons of movies being downloaded from torrents and fileshare services are watched once, then trashed; the committed "collectors" are a miniscule figure. And it can be done anonymously, a huge improvement over the old practice of renting porn from a brick-and-mortar store (the closest old time equivalent to watch-and-delete). Yeah, comparisons between porn and music are never perfect, but I feel that many of these fileshare users could be won back with an Itunes model - all scenes from all studios in one place, buyable on a scene-by-scene basis and through micropayments (whether Paypal or something else). I doubt it would be enough to save some niche producers like Woodman (who's really digging his own grave with his constant BS "yeah, I'll release that scene next month!" promises anyway...only idiots and extremely committed fans allow themselves to be strung along like that as paying subscribers), but for porn overall...yeah, I feel it would work.