Audrey Jane

for girls who already have a page here at EBI: updates, pictures, movies

Moderators: dutchy, Raytech

Audrey Jane

Postby cumfortune on Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:33 pm

Attachments
AAA_141.jpg
AAA_141.jpg (181.85 KiB) Viewed 33442 times
AAA_142.jpg
AAA_142.jpg (77.61 KiB) Viewed 33442 times
User avatar
cumfortune
Moves like Jagger
 
Posts: 1324
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 5:01 pm

Re: Audrey Jane

Postby Pierre Woodman on Sat Jan 09, 2016 10:07 pm

Yes she is sweet girl ...
First time on camera and first anal + DP at WCX soon ...

Audrey-Jane-(-First-anal-and-DP-).jpg
Audrey-Jane-(-First-anal-and-DP-).jpg (135.21 KiB) Viewed 33296 times

PW
-----1989 - 2023----- 34 years of porn . What else ??? https://twitter.com/TheAtrax
User avatar
Pierre Woodman
Il Maestro
 
Posts: 6050
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: All

Re: Audrey Jane

Postby chris on Sun Jan 10, 2016 8:27 am

Attachments
sdfkb2snbfg.jpg
sdfkb2snbfg.jpg (239 KiB) Viewed 33227 times
chris
Numero Uno
 
Posts: 12902
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:04 pm

Re: Audrey Jane

Postby Goldstar on Sun Jan 10, 2016 3:52 pm



ABOUT
Jane is an exclusive top model and luxury escort,sensual and well-mannered,she is the perfect companion for an unforgettable passionate date.
PROFILE
NAME: JANE
AGE: 24
LOCATION: MOSCOW
NATIONALITY: EUROPEAN
HEIGHT: 173 cm.
MEASUREMENTS: 84-60-90
WEIGHT: 53 kg.
BUILD: SLIM
HAIR: BROWN
LANGUAGES: ENGLISH,RUSSIAN
FAVORITE DRINK: CHAMPAGNE
FAVORITE CUISINE: FRENCH
FAVORITE DESIGNER: LA PERLA

RATES
1 HOUR: 1000€
2 HOURS: 1500€
OVERNIGHT: 3500€
WEEKEND: 7500€
WEEK: 18500€


EUR 1000 per hour. :lol:
She's isn't as pretty as she thinks she is.
Obviously, she or her pimp/loverboy are too enthusiastic about her market value in the prostitution world.
She isn't of the same level appearance wise as, let's say, a Danica/Amanda. Jane is more Mid-class FKK Saunaclub level for EUR 50 per half hour/100 per hour.
Surely she wouldn't be considered a top class stunner in these kind of clubs in Germany, Switzerland, Austria. Maybe, if she wasn't like 35 already. Maybe if she was still 18-20.
A girl who has no problem with hooking, for sure wouldn't go into the xbiz if she could make a living with multiple booking a week for EUR 1000 an hour.
That we see her suck schlongs on cam now only corroborates my initial thoughts.
P.S. "Favorite Cuisine: French", lol, what French Sausage, I suppose? :P
User avatar
Goldstar
Respected member
 
Posts: 990
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 10:33 am

Re: Audrey Jane

Postby Pierre Woodman on Sun Jan 10, 2016 5:07 pm

lol, what French Sausage,


Maybe mine because at least I know her in real and you don't but find always a way to speak bad about all girls I put here. Not sure this is the best strategy, once again you just proove how it's easy to be mean for free !!!
This girl is not a tiger in bed for sure but she has a good heart and for me she is nice person.
Put your balls on the table man, show who you are that we can see your top model face able to just critic everyone all the time instead to try be correct ...

PW
-----1989 - 2023----- 34 years of porn . What else ??? https://twitter.com/TheAtrax
User avatar
Pierre Woodman
Il Maestro
 
Posts: 6050
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: All

Re: Audrey Jane

Postby Goldstar on Sun Jan 10, 2016 5:33 pm

Pierre Woodman wrote:
lol, what French Sausage,


Maybe mine because at least I know her in real and you don't but find always a way to speak bad about all girls I put here. Not sure this is the best strategy, once again you just proove how it's easy to be mean for free !!!
This girl is not a tiger in bed for sure but she has a good heart and for me she is nice person.
Put your balls on the table man, show who you are that we can see your top model face able to just critic everyone all the time instead to try be correct ...

PW


Why does this producer ALWAYS has to negatively interpret EVERYTHING?
The producers makes forum members often very tired
Does everyone ALWAYS need too explain to the producer EVERYTHING so that HE UNDERSTANDS?????
Okay, I will play along.

This was meant as a JOKE IN FAVOR OF THE PRODUCER.
There is a smiley that is placed behind the sentence.
This one: :P
This smiley should have been an indicator for the producer that Goldstar sees it as a POSITIVE thing that the girls Favorite cuisine is FRENCH (as she said so herself).
Goldstar knows that the producer who upped a hardcore picture is FRENCH.
So Goldstar makes a fun joke that the Girl must for sure be a fan of FRENCH SAUSAGE seeing that the girl seems to like getting fucked by a FRENCH SAUSAGE in the anus in the picture he upped.
SAUSAGE is a synonym for penis of the male kind.

Get it?

P.S. Are all model scouts pretty boys? I don't think so. Are all model agency agents top pretty? I don't think so. Are all fashion photographers pretty boys? I don't think so. Are all fashion editor's who decide if a girl is pretty enough to feature in their magazine top pretty? I don't think so. Are all whore mongers who like to fuck only pretty whores, top male models? I don't think so. Goldstar NEVER said nor pretended he is a handsome man. Actually, Goldstar can be considered having the same level of ugliness like the producer and he is entitled to his opinion JUST like the producer who surely also said/says, thought/thinks, found/finds HUNDEREDS of times that a girl was/is not pretty enough to feature in his scenes/movies, no? The producer knows better than any other male on the planet, that you don't need to be a top pretty boy yourself to have an opinion whether or not a girl is pretty enough. The prodcucer shows a perfect example of the pot calling the kettle black.
User avatar
Goldstar
Respected member
 
Posts: 990
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 10:33 am

Re: Audrey Jane

Postby Pierre Woodman on Sun Jan 10, 2016 6:19 pm

The producer critic the girls he knows personaly only and if he has serious arguments for it ...
But mentionned this girl is a prostitute without be sure it's herself who put these pictures is not a nice thing. There are thousand of fake escort profiles on the net.
I do not denie that she could have been an escort, she explained herself in the casting that she was travelling a lot and all is clear, but she told me she did not make it since 3 years which means there are many chances this site with this rate are not the truth ...

PW
-----1989 - 2023----- 34 years of porn . What else ??? https://twitter.com/TheAtrax
User avatar
Pierre Woodman
Il Maestro
 
Posts: 6050
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: All

Re: Audrey Jane

Postby Goldstar on Sun Jan 10, 2016 7:05 pm

Pierre Woodman wrote:The producer critic the girls he knows personaly only and if he has serious arguments for it ...
But mentionned this girl is a prostitute without be sure it's herself who put these pictures is not a nice thing. There are thousand of fake escort profiles on the net.
I do not denie that she could have been an escort, she explained herself in the casting that she was travelling a lot and all is clear, but she told me she did not make it since 3 years which means there are many chances this site with this rate are not the truth ...

PW


I'm sorry, but this is bull-shit. You don't need to see a girl in private to know for sure whether or not she is top pretty.
Every professional in the xbiz or in fashion can tell from a photo if a (new) girl is pretty or has potential. Girls get assignments and get flown all over the world for photo shoots/editorials based on photos alone. These decisions are NOT based on real life encounters with a girl. Everyone knows this. I have never heard some agency pushing or telling a (potential) client who initially had no interest in a girl because they deemed her looks to be unsufficient:" well, she looks prettier in real life. You must meet her before saying no or forming an opinion on her looks". If a new girl wants to have a job in porn/fashion and e-mails a producer/agency a picture of herself, then that producer/agency will know within a second whether or not she is pretty enough for the job and if he thus wants to invite her for a job!!!! Pretending that this is not the case is lying. I mean, If I remember correctly "a certain producer" said one time that he immediately hopped on the plane when he saw a picture of a girl called Jessika Lux. For sure this was a BIG RISK then, seeing he had not yet met her in PRIVATE? :roll: In other words, you can perfectly tell if a girl is top pretty or has potential without ever meeting her in real life.

Also, c'mon now, every man knows that women are like lawyers. They often already lie on the moment they move their lips.
Every girl can lie in such a way that she could be an Oscar winner for that performance. Every girl knows how to play men (especially men who are essentially strangers to them like producers and clients) to get what they want and know what they want to hear and then tell 'em exactly that. A man must really be a knucklehead to believe anything a girl says to them when it comes to such delicate matters as (previous) escort/prostitution life, let alone believe anything a verified (former) prostitute claims or says about it.

Be it how it is, the only thing I said is that she isn't worth EUR 1000 per hour. And seeing how this producer said she isn't " a tiger in bed", I don't think I'm far from the truth with what I said about her market value. Also, anyone slightly familiar with the Swiss/Austrian/German FKK Saunaclub scene can tell another man, that that girl is worth 50 per half hour if you compare her looks (and supposed mediocre performance like mentioned here) with her peers in that niche. Don't get me wrong, she isn't ugly. Not a bit, but she's average at best if placed among her peers and seen in a prostitution perspective, or more so, if seen in the high-end EUR 1000 an hour prostitution league/level. Again, I suppose she's nice (and I never pretended otherwise) but combined with her mature age she's just not exceptional pretty looking and thus it doesn't warrant that amount of dough per hour when looked at from a broader perspective.

This does not mean that she cannot develop in a good performer later in her career for lower amounts of dough per scene. That's a whole nother story.
Maybe she is one of those girls who can't see porn/prostitution as a job and will perform better with the Marcus Schenkenberg type. It will be interesting to see and compare future scenes to analyze whether or not there is a change of interaction or physical explosion (if any) between her and other boys. Time will tell.
User avatar
Goldstar
Respected member
 
Posts: 990
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 10:33 am

Re: Audrey Jane

Postby Pierre Woodman on Sun Jan 10, 2016 8:22 pm

I don't know who you are but I can't believe you're trying to tell to ME what is it to deal with girls pictures before meet them !!! From my fashion photographer time till today it's 30 years I do it almost every day !!!
And you are wrong because often the first idea with the picture and the reality are TWO WORLDS !!!
Enough with this discussion, there is never anything constructives with you Goldstar, only fight and fight ...
I'm here to put pictures of girls and share with porn lovers my personnal feeling about those I have sex with, you are here just to find something wrong in any women, we don't enjoy the life the same way !!!

PW
-----1989 - 2023----- 34 years of porn . What else ??? https://twitter.com/TheAtrax
User avatar
Pierre Woodman
Il Maestro
 
Posts: 6050
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: All

Re: Audrey Jane

Postby horndogger on Mon Jan 11, 2016 6:40 am

Don't post pictures, don't share stories and anecdotes ..... just 1,2,3 edit that hotel room handy cam shoot !!
horndogger
zoinked out dog
 
Posts: 475
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:41 am

Re: Audrey Jane

Postby Pierre Woodman on Mon Jan 11, 2016 8:09 pm

idiot.png
idiot.png (44.26 KiB) Viewed 32834 times

PW
-----1989 - 2023----- 34 years of porn . What else ??? https://twitter.com/TheAtrax
User avatar
Pierre Woodman
Il Maestro
 
Posts: 6050
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: All

Re: Audrey Jane

Postby robot on Mon Jan 11, 2016 8:39 pm


stop fighting your childish arguments in this forum.

pfff. i dont see any other producer getting attacked, all the time and by so many people (yes, excluding the million ricardos) anywhere else.
really. name even one.
guys, who cares if he has a time machine, claims he's the most successful first-first-ever to find exclusive first-triple-first-anal victoria's secret models, years before anyone else. Don't like it, don't agree with it? put him on ignore. i'm tired of seeing endless fights in all the threads, I don't even read it and I guess most people also do not read it, unless they want to have triple knots in their brain.

if you don't, it's like replying to "ALL" when you get spam and some people start replying to all, then people reply to all telling them not to reply to all... it clogs everybody.
User avatar
robot
Furry Psycho
 
Posts: 3964
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 6:54 pm
Location: last house on the left

Re: Audrey Jane

Postby horndogger on Mon Jan 11, 2016 8:57 pm

robot wrote:
stop fighting your childish arguments in this forum.

pfff. i dont see any other producer getting attacked, all the time and by so many people (yes, excluding the million ricardos) anywhere else.
really. name even one.
guys, who cares if he has a time machine, claims he's the most successful first-first-ever to find exclusive first-triple-first-anal victoria's secret models, years before anyone else. Don't like it, don't agree with it? put him on ignore. i'm tired of seeing endless fights in all the threads, I don't even read it and I guess most people also do not read it, unless they want to have triple knots in their brain.

if you don't, it's like replying to "ALL" when you get spam and some people start replying to all, then people reply to all telling them not to reply to all... it clogs everybody.


Robot, I have respect for you and your commitment to this site, which is a great place for info about girls, thank you. I will say that there is one producer who is attacked more than PW, it's LP , which is attacked by PW ... :lol: :lol: :lol:
horndogger
zoinked out dog
 
Posts: 475
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:41 am

Re: Audrey Jane

Postby Pierre Woodman on Mon Jan 11, 2016 11:41 pm

Well the DP picture I have put here has been watched right now by 500 persons and I can see 3 haters have posted a comment !!! I can live with that ...

PW
-----1989 - 2023----- 34 years of porn . What else ??? https://twitter.com/TheAtrax
User avatar
Pierre Woodman
Il Maestro
 
Posts: 6050
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: All

Re: Audrey Jane

Postby robot on Wed Jan 13, 2016 3:07 pm

horndogger wrote: I will say that there is one producer who is attacked more than PW, it's LP , which is attacked by PW ... :lol: :lol: :lol:

hey! not fair! that doesn't count :mrgreen:
it's like saying blacks are picked on by the KKK when I ask who's the most reviled group amongst leftists.

seriously, let go of your grudge, otherwise you'll get colon cancer. I don't know, go to the range, get some +P and a bleeding target, tape PW's mug to it or even do a latex mold and mask, and do El Presidente with 3 mannequins. just an idea. and send me the video, with a timer and all
User avatar
robot
Furry Psycho
 
Posts: 3964
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 6:54 pm
Location: last house on the left

Next

Return to The Eurobabeindex Girls

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: jayzeek and 97 guests