Missing girls??

[Mr_White]

Yes, I agree with what you said, Mr_White.

Thanks.

According to EBI, I think its just a little bit exception. Similar to ADT website, this site is well known by insiders from adult business, it has a good reputation, it has good connections and even some people from business are actively visiting for example the forum.

Of course EBI has a good reputation. And it is much appreciated that people from within the biz visit and post here.

In my opinion so deleting several entries is denying the logic but I think it was a matter of decision to remove them and stay ok or keep them and probably start facing some problems from angry girls wanting their entry to be removed and maybe loss of reputation. I totally understand that.

Understanding - in a way - yes.
But, if you think your idea to the very end, there would be no EBI, once all girls would start to get angry about it.... And with that picture something would be way wrong, if you ask me.
Plus, you should never forget that even the imdb (which for sure is not a porn related website) publishes information about porn movies and actors/actresses too. You think an angry girl could prevent them from doing so?

[XEXX]

I can understand deleting a model at her request if she hasn't had an extensive career in porn, like Caroline C. It was a good thing to do by EBI. Why? Well, there wasn't much info there anyway and it's better to think of the model rather than a bunch of horny fanboys.

But it would be a joke to ever delete an entry like Jane Darling or Jennifer Dark.... because they've done hundreds of movies and are more well-known... and they've done escort work, so they're pretty much dedicated to the 'world's oldest profession'.

[Pelorus]

I agree with you on this one .
I think that Jane Darling or some other famous girls wouldn't even bother asking to remove their entries since it wouldn't change much in the way of "hiding" their work as there is so much of it on the internet - just my 2 cents on this subject ...